As faculty, you are an important resource of the College of Medicine. The quality and success of our institution depend on the intellectual environment created by an outstanding faculty and your continuing commitment to our education, research, patient care and community improvement missions.

The Office of Faculty Affairs works collaboratively with the Schmidt College of Medicine leadership, department chairs and University leadership to promote faculty and organizational success consistent with the College���s Strategic Plan and evolving LCME standards. Faculty Affairs has a broad range of responsibilities that offer resources and support for our faculty.

The Faculty Handbook contains all relevant information and policies for faculty. We have put together resources relevant to faculty development, faculty vitality and success among other topics. If there are additional topics you would find helpful, or you would like additional information about any of these resources, please contact our office.

Thank you for all that you do on behalf of the students, residents and patients to improve the health of our community. We are here to serve and look forward to continued collaboration and success!

Mahyar A. Nouri-Shirazi, Ph.D.
Associate Dean of Faculty Affairs
Professor of Immunology
mnourish@health.fau.edu

Michael Turtz, M.P.A.
Director of Administration
mturtz@health.fau.edu

Faculty Affairs Responsibilities

  • Assist departments in recruiting, developing, promoting, and retaining outstanding and innovative faculty members.
  • Provide guidance on faculty recruitment, academic appointments, appointment renewals, and related administrative processes.
  • Develop, implement, and coordinate faculty affairs initiatives, projects, and processes essential to faculty success, including promotion and tenure, annual evaluations and assignments, post-tenure evaluations, third-year reviews, mentoring, and sabbaticals.
  • Oversee faculty development and advancement for College and affiliate faculty, supporting career development, scholarship, leadership, and promotion and tenure, with particular emphasis on teaching and education and alignment with faculty members��� roles, responsibilities, and professional goals.
  • Provide consultation on faculty progress, research, and scholarship related to promotion and tenure, and facilitate timely faculty evaluations and tenure progress assessments in accordance with institutional requirements.
  • Collaborate with the Dean, the Provost���s Office, and College leadership to develop and revise faculty affairs policies and documents in accordance with University regulations and the requirements of national accrediting bodies.
  • Advise faculty, department chairs, and administrators on the interpretation of and compliance with University and College faculty affairs regulations, policies, and practices.
  • Collaborate with department chairs and administrators to promote consistency in departmental policies, procedures, and documentation.
  • Foster a culture of respect, collegiality, and professionalism among College faculty by promoting transparent leadership and decision-making and adherence to the College���s principles, values, and policies.
  • Support the resolution of faculty concerns and disciplinary matters and contribute to the development and implementation of faculty affairs policies and procedures.
  • Oversee faculty immigration matters and collaborate on faculty affairs budget planning and development.

Faculty Academic Enrichment Fund

Financial support is available to provide faculty with resources and experiences that enhance opportunities for scholarship and career growth leading to promotion.

Faculty members with 0.5 FTE or greater and primary appointments in the Clinical Science Department may apply for Academic Enrichment Fund. Applicants who have received awards two years in a row totaling $6,000 are ineligible to receive funding until one year has elapsed since the last award.

The Academic Enrichment Fund provides financial support for individual or multiple faculty members for academic work, with strong preference to work related to projects in the two project categories listed below. The expenses covered may include research supplies, purchase of equipment, software, stipends for students or research assistants, travel expenses, conference or course fees, production costs, and other such expenses if required for implementation of the proposal. Priority will be given to projects that are completed during the academic year in which funding was awarded and that have the potential to further the applicant���s career development and/or lead to further external funding.

  1. Teaching Activities
    This category covers projects directed to enriching a faculty member's teaching. It covers funding for educational projects that are not already supported by time included in the applicant���s AoR or other College resources. Projects should lead to the publication or presentation of scholarly peer-reviewed materials and/or the acquisition of program development funding. Examples of funding possibilities under this category include but are not limited to: 1) development of teaching methods; 2) inclusion of teaching materials in a peer-reviewed venue; 3) presentation of teaching materials at conferences and workshops; 4) travel expenses for consultation and study with leaders of pedagogical and disciplinary trends at other institutions; and 5) production of texts or educational software.
  2. Research Activities
    This category covers projects directed to enriching a faculty member's research program leading to the publication or presentation of scholarly peer-reviewed articles and/or the acquisition of external funding. Research may be basic, translational, clinical/health services, quality improvement, or educational. ��Examples of possible projects in this category include but are not limited to: 1) development of research projects through collection of pilot data; 2) "bridge funding" for funded projects that are expiring that have promising results; 3) publication of research findings in a peer-reviewed venue; ) presentation of research findings at scientific meetings, conferences, and other institutions; 5) consultation with outside experts; and 6) travel to research centers for consultation with other professionals and/or training in research methods if required for implementation of the proposal.

Applications for funding are accepted twice a year, with the Spring Cycle requiring submissions by December 10 of the preceding year and the Fall Cycle by July 10 of the same year.

Whenever a deadline falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or holiday, it will be extended to the next successive working day at 5:00 p.m. All proposals should be submitted electronically to the Office of Faculty Affairs through the .

Funds will be distributed after each cycle, based on the review and ranking of proposals by the Academic Enrichment Fund Committee, until all available funds are allocated. Committee members who are applicants will not participate in ranking their own applications. The Committee will formally meet twice a year to review proposals and recommend funding.

Applicants will be notified of funding decisions within five weeks of the application deadline.

Material in applications is restricted to the application form and a proposed budget justification. Failure to provide any of the required information will render the application incomplete, and it will be returned to the applicant for completion prior to review.

The narrative and budget must be limited to three single-spaced or double-spaced pages and address the importance, need, and feasibility of the project. The budget section must include a reasonably detailed explanation of how the requested funds will be spent.

  1. A brief description of previous teaching experiences and/or research relevant to the project
  2. Describe in what significant ways will the proposed activity enhance your academic development
  3. Describe the specific outcomes including when and where will your scholarly work be presented or published

In recommending proposals for funding, the Academic Enrichment Fund Committee will utilize the following general criteria:

  1. Quality and scope of the proposed project��
  2. Potential to further the applicant���s career development��
  3. Potential to lead to further external funding
  4. Relevance of the proposed project to College/Department missions��
  5. Strength and clarity of goals, activities and outcomes of the proposal
  6. Intellectual and professional impact of the proposed project
  7. Likelihood that proposal achieves its stated aims
  8. Academic enrichment for students
  9. Justification of the proposed budget
  10. Project previously not funded at FAU

Proposals from junior and senior faculty are equally welcome, and will receive full consideration. Special consideration may also be given to first-time applicants who have not received Academic Enrichment Fund in the previous year.

Successful applicants must provide the Academic Enrichment Fund Committee with a brief final report within eight weeks of completion of the project. Those who do not file a final report are ineligible to receive future Academic Enrichment Fund support and may be required to return some of the dispersed funds received.

Faculty Affairs Resources

The Peer Review of Teaching program has two purposes: formative evaluations (requested by the faculty member for their own personal growth as an educator) and summative evaluations (formal evaluations that can be included in annual evaluations and for promotion and tenure consideration).

Formative and Summative Evaluations of large group teaching (lectures and team-based learning), small group teaching (facilitation, problem-based learning), and clinical or bedside teaching are available for all faculty.

  1. All faculty members with significant classroom teaching assignments (greater than 6 hours of lecture) must be reviewed with a summative evaluation annually.
  2. The summative review must be part of the faculty member’s annual evaluation.
  3. Faculty members seeking promotion in rank must have three summative evaluations completed as a part of their portfolio prior to seeking promotion.
  • This program is for peer review of medical student and resident teaching designed for a variety of settings.

Peer Review of Teaching Forms available soon.

Mission:

The Teaching Academy supports the continuous advancement of educators and educational scholarship to serve the community of the Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine.

Value:

The Academy is an inclusive and prestigious community of educators dedicated to lifelong learning and educational excellence.

Consistent with the Teaching Academy’s mission and value statements it is the intent of the Academy to be a recognition society that is as inclusive as possible, while maintaining requirements for tiered levels of membership. Activities will be planned by a steering committee of Teaching Academy members, with support from the Office of Faculty Affairs. All faculty at any rank, or any educational role are eligible to apply for membership. A membership subcommittee of Teaching Academy members will select members each year. Criteria includes evidence of educational scholarship, teaching performance and commitment to teaching

Levels of Membership:

  • Active Member: The demonstrated pursuit of Teaching Academy goals through Leadership, research projects, mentorship, attendance at local/national meetings, and 70% attendance at Teaching Academy events. In addition to the current summative feedback required of faculty, strong encouragement will be made to participate in observed teaching as part of their “leadership” modeling.
  • Affiliate Member:     Attendance at 50% of Teaching Academy events with open encouragement of expanding their participation at all levels.

Coming Soon!

勛圖厙 offers a variety of awards for faculty - visit the Provost Faculty Award Programs page for more information. Those interested in nominating a colleague or self-nominating should contact the Office of Faculty Affairs.

The College of Medicine offers annual teaching awards with nominations announced yearly.

Below is a sample of faculty development links from a variety of medical schools and sources.

Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell:
勛圖厙 International University Herbert Wertheim School of Medicine:
Johns Hopkins Medicine:

Specific topics:

  • Teaching Methods (What’s effective?)
  • Assessment (Which ones should I use?)
  • Adult Learning (What to know about adult learners.)
  • Learners as Teachers (How do I start?)
  • Useful Resources (Check these out.)
勛圖厙

Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine

The Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine offers medical degrees through seven departments, as well as Master and Ph.D. programs.

Contact Us

location_on
勛圖厙
777 Glades Road, BC-71
Boca Raton, FL 33431